<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Leadpile's Blog&#187; ad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/tag/ad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog</link>
	<description>Leadpile - The World's Largest Lead Marketplace / Lead Exchange - Where Lead Buyers and Sellers Meet!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:43:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Increase in Ad Search Spending</title>
		<link>http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/2011/01/18/increase-in-ad-search-spending/</link>
		<comments>http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/2011/01/18/increase-in-ad-search-spending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lead Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leadpile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/?p=49394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Searchignite, the demand for paid searches went up in 2010. While only 17.4% of search ad spending was done through Bing and Yahoo, Google dominated with 82.6% of search ads. The market is up 18.5% from 2009 when search ad spending was beginning to decrease. Retailers had very impressive spending because of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Searchignite, the <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-20028764-93.html?tag=cnetRiver">demand</a> for paid searches went up in 2010. While only 17.4% of search ad spending was done through Bing and Yahoo, Google dominated with 82.6% of search ads. The market is up 18.5% from 2009 when search ad spending was beginning to decrease. Retailers had very impressive spending because of the busy holiday season. December by itself had a 44.8% increase. While some speculated that there would be a continued decrease, these numbers prove something different. Leadpile uses ad spending as an option just as many others are continuing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/2011/01/18/increase-in-ad-search-spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Media Buys Defeats Offline Print Spend in 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/2010/12/20/online-media-buys-defeats-offline-print-spend-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/2010/12/20/online-media-buys-defeats-offline-print-spend-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lead Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertisement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertisements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leadpile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/?p=48674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Exciting news for online advertisers! Online advertising spend comes in at #1 in 2010, totaling $25.8 billion, closely followed by print publications at $25.7 billion. Many advertisers have shifted offline spend to new online campaigns, some even dabbling in social networking media buys. Advertisers are shifting offline dollars to campaigns that have more measureable results [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/2010-media-spend1.tiff"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48704" title="2010 media spend" src="http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/2010-media-spend1.tiff" alt="lead exchange Online Media Buys Defeats Offline Print Spend in 2010"  /></a></p>
<p>Exciting news for online advertisers! <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/93560/print-online-newspaper-ad-spending-defeated-by-online-ad-buys-2011/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Inquisitr+%28Inquisitr%3A+All%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader">Online advertising spend comes in at #1</a> in 2010, totaling $25.8 billion, closely followed by print publications at $25.7 billion. Many advertisers have shifted offline spend to new online campaigns, some even dabbling in social networking media buys. Advertisers are shifting offline dollars to campaigns that have more measureable results such as banner ads or email campaigns.  Even more stunning forecasts are that online display spend will overtake search ads by 2014.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/2010/12/20/online-media-buys-defeats-offline-print-spend-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Increases Returns On Email Marketing?</title>
		<link>http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/2010/06/25/twitter-increases-returns-on-email-marketing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/2010/06/25/twitter-increases-returns-on-email-marketing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Monica Vo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lead Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Closing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leadpile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[messages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Returns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[think]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/?p=41334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent study indicated that the use of at least three social media options in email marketing campaigns lead to a 55% higher click-through rate.  The interesting thing is that only about half of email marketers are adding some sort of social element to their email campaigns.
The real ROI comes in the shared messages of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent study indicated that the use of at least three social media options in email marketing campaigns lead to a 55% higher click-through rate.  The interesting thing is that only about half of email marketers are adding some sort of social element to their email campaigns.</p>
<p>The real ROI comes in the shared messages of these type of campaigns. Messages that included a sharing option generated 30% higher click-throughs than emails without the social sharing links.  Three or more generated 55% higher click-throughs.  Twitter alone showed a 40% higher CTR than without a sharing link.  Twitter appears to be the most popular option at 67.2% of all social  emails with Facebook coming in a close second at 62.7%.</p>
<p>Think about it, you send an email to a million users in your email list.  If 55% of the users that click through your message and share it with their 130+ friends on Facebook or followers on Twitter, imagine how much ROI you are getting on that email campaign without any additional cost!  Folks, time to start A/B testing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/2010/06/25/twitter-increases-returns-on-email-marketing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Shake, On An Old Favorite!</title>
		<link>http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/2009/09/22/new-shake-on-an-old-favorite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/2009/09/22/new-shake-on-an-old-favorite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Natasha Aronov</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lead Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand Marnier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leadpile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/?p=20684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Grand Marnier a liquor that has always been presented with class, is launching a new advertising campaign in October revitalizing it&#8217;s image and hoping to attract a younger demographic. French images with a more of a modern twist than seen in previous campaigns, will be intertwined with social media and consumer involvement. According to Adweek [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grand Marnier a liquor that has always been presented with class, is launching a new advertising campaign in October revitalizing it&#8217;s image and hoping to attract a younger demographic. French images with a more of a modern twist than seen in previous campaigns, will be intertwined with social media and consumer involvement. According to Adweek , Grand Marnier who is new to the social media world will be hoping to attract attention from new and existing buyers through banner ad placements on Facebook.<br />
In addition to the more commonly placed banner ads, using one of the more “on top of the trends” approaches Grand Marnier has developed two iPhone applications that will promote consumer involvement. A game that consumers are able to pour drinks with a simulated shaker, and e-cards that feature animation will encourage people to connect with the efforts to revamp the brand.<br />
Does consumer involvement attract additional dollars? I know that given the opportunity to have a fun new application on my phone would entice me to possibly bring up the brand name in conversation.  Heightening awareness of the product…however, does not change my likes or dislikes, suddenly developing a taste for Grand Marnier will probably not happen even though I do like the look and feel of the new campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/2009/09/22/new-shake-on-an-old-favorite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Ad Size Really Matter?   Leadpile Thinks So!</title>
		<link>http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/2009/08/25/does-ad-size-really-matter-leadpile-thinks-so/</link>
		<comments>http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/2009/08/25/does-ad-size-really-matter-leadpile-thinks-so/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mari Woods Holt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affiliate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Marketplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leadpile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadpile Lead Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/?p=17834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A daily conversation that myself and others in the affiliate marketing world deal with is the question of the form/ad/banner sizes.  Leadpile is a perfect example of someone that has revolutionized a &#8220;smaller&#8221; version of forms and banners with the Microclick form, but is it more effective?  &#8230;.OR is it more effective to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A daily conversation that myself and others in the affiliate marketing world deal with is the question of the form/ad/banner sizes.  Leadpile is a perfect example of someone that has revolutionized a &#8220;smaller&#8221; version of forms and banners with the <a href="http://www.microclick.com/">Microclick</a> form, but is it more effective?  &#8230;.OR is it more effective to have a larger leaderboard size banners or ad?  How about a full size form on a website that does not allow as much content on the site, is that better?  According to the <a href="http://www.bizreport.com/2009/08/display_ads_-_does_size_matter.html">Bizreport.com</a>, banner size could in fact matter with the effectiveness of it&#8217;s message and goal.<br />
Ultimately, all of us that are in the lead generation business and want to maintain longevity must always keep the user experience in mind to maintain effectiveness.  The bottom line is consumers need to feel a sense of security when clicking on or filling out any form.  Maybe having more content around the form instead of the larger form/banner occupying a large part of the site, might be a better idea for the consumer.  The jury is out on what really is more effective, but I will say Leadpile Lead Exchange believes a form/banner like the size of the Microclick form is the most effective for the consumer&#8217;s experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.leadpile.com/lead-exchange-blog/2009/08/25/does-ad-size-really-matter-leadpile-thinks-so/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

